Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
Keep & Kill
Last Post: Crusty
Posted On: 4 Hours Ago
Replies: 34,271
Views: 2,142,704
Chrome
Last Post: sungod
Posted On: 20 Hours Ago
Replies: 6
Views: 239
|
Members Birthdays
|
|

11th December 2022
|
Chief Harley Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 596 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200T Sportster/Buell Year: 2017
|
|
What's wrong with Monday after work? LOL.
|

11th December 2022
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Loxahatchee, FL (S. FL)
Posts: 2,137 Sportster/Buell Model: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year: 2003 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XL Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1981 Other Motorcycle Model: FXDC Other Motorcycle Year: 2013
|
|
Looks good John-it do add a nice cosmetic touch
And more visible-er
__________________
Steve
'81 Andrews "Y" cams, K. Black 9-1 pistons
'03 1250 NRHS stage two Lightning heads, SE536 cams, mik flat slide 42
'01 Cyclone stock
'13 FXDC 96" stock
|

24th December 2022
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,454 Sportster/Buell Model: 1250 Sportster/Buell Year: 1991
|
|
Finally got a chance to ride this morning. Ride feels a bit smoother on freeway, rode over a couple harsh transition spots on 101 and crossed some railroad tracks a few times. Much better response for sure and seem to be a definite improvement over stock, no "bucking" sensation. No signs of topping out or bottoming, so I'm going to leave the preload alone.
I'd say they perform as hoped for at the price point.
John
|

25th December 2022
|
Dazed & Confused
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Never Never Land
Posts: 3,366 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200C Sportster/Buell Year: 2017 Other Motorcycle Model: BMW R9T Other Motorcycle Year: 2015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Harper
Finally got a chance to ride this morning. Ride feels a bit smoother...
|
If you get a chance measure the bike only sag and the rider on sag. It would be helpful for the discussion we've had here.
__________________
2017 XL1200C in SE Wisconsin, USA
|

25th December 2022
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,454 Sportster/Buell Model: 1250 Sportster/Buell Year: 1991
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomcatt
If you get a chance measure the bike only sag and the rider on sag. It would be helpful for the discussion we've had here.
|
I measured eye to eye both shocks, while on jiffy stand, both sides measure 13". Should I put it on lift to check bike sag?
Merry Christmas to everyone!
John
|

25th December 2022
|
Dazed & Confused
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Never Never Land
Posts: 3,366 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200C Sportster/Buell Year: 2017 Other Motorcycle Model: BMW R9T Other Motorcycle Year: 2015
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Harper
I measured eye to eye both shocks, while on jiffy stand, both sides measure 13". Should I put it on lift to check bike sag?
|
There are three numbers you need:
Shock, fully extended, eye to eye length.
Bike only, standing vertical.
Bike with rider on, feet on pegs, bike vertical.
I recruit my neighbor to do the measuring for me.
Bike only, standing vertical, is easiest. I just stand straddling the bike to hold it vertical while my helper measures the shock eye to eye length.
Rider on is more difficult. I sit on the bike in my garage door opening. Feet on the pegs, holding onto the garage door track to stay upright, bike in gear so it doesn't want to roll. Again with a helper to measure the shock eye to eye length.
The two values , sag and rider on sag, are useful because you want your rider on sag (ride height) to strike a balance between bottoming and topping. And the two give a reference about spring rates.
Frequently it's easier to measure spring collar to spring collar. The sag and rider on sag numbers will be the same.
Last edited by Tomcatt; 25th December 2022 at 16:51..
|

25th December 2022
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,454 Sportster/Buell Model: 1250 Sportster/Buell Year: 1991
|
|
Okay, next time my buddy stops by I'll have him help do some measurements.
John
|

18th February 2023
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,076 Sportster/Buell Model: Sportster Sportster/Buell Year: 1990 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Sportster Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1975 Other Motorcycle Model: Buell S1 W Other Motorcycle Year: 1998
|
|
I know this thread is old, but paging Tomcatt ... are your olhins HD753?
If not, which model ?
__________________
1990 Sportster Axtell 90 ci, CP Carrillo 3.875 30° deg pistons,STD Heads, 615V2 RedShift cams, HSR48,
Carrillo 6.938 rods (All HammerPerf)
Hammer Billet Sledge air filter
Hammer Billet Manifold.
160/60ZR17 rear on Akront 5.50" Alu rim
100/90-19 front on Akront 2.50" new Alu rim
YSS 13.75 rear shocks
1975 XLH almost stock
1998 Buell S1W almost stock
|

18th February 2023
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4,454 Sportster/Buell Model: 1250 Sportster/Buell Year: 1991
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by conv90
I know this thread is old, but paging Tomcatt ... are your olhins HD753?
If not, which model ?
|
Have you sent him a PM? He's responded to mine.
John
|

18th February 2023
|
 |
Senior Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Emilia, Italy
Posts: 2,928 Sportster/Buell Model: xl883n Iron (2019 engine) Sportster/Buell Year: 2017 Sportster/Buell Model #2: xl Hugger (sold) Sportster/Buell Year #2: 2001
|
|
Ohlins are top notch... i admit... a bit wasted on my mild stock 883... like USD forks and dual front disks...
i had enough satisfaction with 13.4" OEM emulsion... even as i am not kind when riding...
nonoteless sometimes i think about a pair of them... but I will consider it only if my OEMs will start to leak...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19.
|