Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
video & pics
Last Post: cal43
Posted On: 11 Minutes Ago
Replies: 2,735
Views: 320,060
Keep & Kill
Last Post: Crusty
Posted On: 3 Hours Ago
Replies: 34,271
Views: 2,142,677
Chrome
Last Post: sungod
Posted On: 19 Hours Ago
Replies: 6
Views: 235
|
Members Birthdays
|
|

17th November 2022
|
Biker
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 51 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
|
|
crankshaft width ironhead
What should be the width of the crankshaft? I have a lot of clearance on the connecting rod. In the photos, the pin is still unscrewed.

|

17th November 2022
|
Senior Chief Harley Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,057 Sportster/Buell Model: 883 Evo Sportster/Buell Year: 1989
|
|
the pin is still unscrewed
???????????
|

18th November 2022
|
Biker
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 51 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
|
|
I mean it is not tightened with the correct torque. After tightening, it can have a smaller width.
|

18th November 2022
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 9,386 Sportster/Buell Model: XLCH 1000 Sportster/Buell Year: 1977 Sportster/Buell Model #2: 75 motor in Norton frame. Other Motorcycle Model: 42WLA 45, Harton, Narley Other Motorcycle Year: 1942
|
|
You have to have the nuts tightened up to 150 ft lb and there should be .005 to .015" clearance between the rod end and the flywheel.
The wheels will come in some as you tighten the nuts up.
|

18th November 2022
|
 |
Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,324 Sportster/Buell Model: KHK Sportster/Buell Year: 1954 Sportster/Buell Model #2: 900cc XLB Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1967 Other Motorcycle Model: 1200cc XLRTT Other Motorcycle Year: 1966
|
|
I measured 3 of my rear con rods' width, all between 1.490 and 1.492 which gives 8 to 10 thou less than 1"1/2.
By the time you tighten your crank nuts to the required torque, it should shrink your 1"533 width to 1"1/2 or there about...
Patrick
|

19th November 2022
|
Biker
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 51 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
|
|
Thanks for help. After tightening is still 0.9 mm of endplay. I checked on the new and the old pin. It's the same gap. I need extra thick washers. I wonder if wide crankshaft will fit into case without a problem. Modern motors with pressed pin require high accuracy. Repair manual always shows this value. Unfortunately not Harley. Probably that difference doesn't matter much. I recently repaired a ktm mx engine where 0.2mm washer caused crankshaft not rotate.

|

19th November 2022
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 8,694 Sportster/Buell Model: XLB, XLCH, Sporton Sportster/Buell Year: 1962 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1966 Other Motorcycle Model: XLCH (Another one) Other Motorcycle Year: 1966
|
|
So, your at 0.035 " which is technically 0.020 " wide.
There are thrust washers on the flywheels and these may be worn. That would account for the extra width. If the se wheels came out of an engine and you replaced the big end bearing because it was shot/worn that would be a good explanation for worn thrust washers.
If that's the problem over all width won't be affected. That is, you won't have a problem when you check the crank end float.
__________________
"I know only too well the evil that I propose. But my inclinations get the better of me."
|

19th November 2022
|
XL FORUM LIFE MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,927 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1974
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by daniel91
.. I wonder if wide crankshaft will fit into case without a problem. Modern motors with pressed pin require high accuracy. Repair manual always shows this value. Unfortunately not Harley. Probably that difference doesn't matter much. I recently repaired a ktm mx engine where 0.2mm washer caused crankshaft not rotate..
|
You should have no worries about fitting the crankshaft in the cases. The fit is not that precise. Comparing these old Harley flywheel assemblies to other engines and designs is just a cause for consternation.
The distance that the sprocket shaft is drawn into the taper in the left flywheel will also have an affect on the centering of the crank in the case. There's no specification in the manual for that. Just a torque value.
Are you rebuilding with the same rods and flywheels that came from a running engine?
|

20th November 2022
|
Biker
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 51 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
|
|
The flywheels and connecting rod come from different engines don't come from a running engine. That's why I wasn't sure if everything was ok. I'm preparing an emergency set of crankshaft and bearings. Once I rebuild my sportster crankshaft. I didn't think about it at the time. I know I could have done better. Now I have time and more knowledge. Old engines are full of surprises and details matter. Especially when you're trying to make something out of scrap metal.
|

20th November 2022
|
Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,044 Sportster/Buell Model: xlch Sportster/Buell Year: 1964 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH IR EFI Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1971 Other Motorcycle Model: BMW K1200RS Other Motorcycle Year: 2001
|
|
“Running” engines do not necessarily contain components that are still in “service wear limits”.
Sounds like you have a handle on things, but be sure to measure all components involved.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17.
|