Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
Corona Virus
Last Post: NLXL
Posted On: 1 Hour Ago
Replies: 1,245
Views: 122,999
|
Members Birthdays
|
GRAYFEATHER (71), vonriken (70), The Crusher (63), madisonlink (60), hillbilly (59), mardyk (56), Blade (54), dmraco (51), jmcclure (44), Ryand36330 (43), nrrs (43), CRB1006 (33), Yoitsjustin1 (21) |
|

7 Hours Ago
|
Chief Master Mechanic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 470 Sportster/Buell Model: XL racebike in progress Sportster/Buell Year: 1981 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Sportster with sidecar Sportster/Buell Year #2: 2001 Other Motorcycle Model: Moto Guzzi V11 Lemans Other Motorcycle Year: 2002
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferretface
In a similar thread where the poster asked what mods should be made to the cycle, kitabel wrote -
My Velo 562 weighs lass than 250#, why exactly would a smaller trans sprocket be needed???
|
With the chair and passenger on my 883 Evo, I have to drag the clutch more than I like to get rolling in first - hence the smaller front sprocket. Your sidecar may weigh 250 lbs., but add a passenger to the mix and things get heavy.
|

2 Hours Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: ...On the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 526 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH Sportster/Buell Year: 1983
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott
With the chair and passenger on my 883 Evo, I have to drag the clutch more than I like to get rolling in first - hence the smaller front sprocket. Your sidecar may weigh 250 lbs., but add a passenger to the mix and things get heavy.
|
Thank you for your reply!
Interesting. My 250# included ballast; I don't expect many pax. My '83 XLH FSM calls for a 21/48 tooth sprocket combination; it came with a 20t trans sprocket, which I've continued. So I imagine that takes care of the 'smaller sprocket'.
When I replaced the H-D gearset in my trans with all-Andrews gears, I chose the Andrews c/r 4th [clutch] gear. I actually never noticed any appreciable difference between the original H-D 4th and the Andrews c/r 4th gear this last Summer. Doesn't make any difference here, I think.
I might add more ballast. On another thread, a member mentioned using 60# ballast; that sounds low to me now. I'm thinking of upping that to 120#...
__________________
All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests)
|
Serious Blac
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:44.
|