Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
Members Birthdays
|
|

9th December 2022
|
Biker
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 1 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH1000 Sportster/Buell Year: 1978
Reputation: 10

|
|
Nice project Paul and a very good result. I am exactly doing the same thing with my Sporty 78. I have an Kawa front end including the wheels and brakes. Only difference is that I use the stock rear swing arm with an ZX front wheel. Also the rear end will be an shorter version. Thanks for the inspiration. Greetings Paul
|

9th December 2022
|
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On a big rock in the Florida Straights
Posts: 510 Sportster/Buell Model: XL 1200 S....X Sportster/Buell Year: 1999 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XR-1000 RX Sportster/Buell Year #2: 83 Other Motorcycle Model: SOLD - RZV500R/R1 hybrid Other Motorcycle Year: 1984
|
|
very nice.. I like the look and the improved suspension...
__________________
----
1999 XL 1200 Sport RX, SE 7500 ignition, SE air filter, DynoJet, K&N, Cone Engineering 2:1 pipe, Storz Steering damper, with 2012 XR1200X perf forks, 3.5 x18" wheels front and rear, Galfer stainless lines, XR1200 4 piston front calipers, 18" Dunlop D404 130/70 and Dunlop trailmax mission 140/80-18 rear XR1200X perf shocks, 19/48 530 chain conversion, Dart Flyscreen, Antigravity LiFePO4 battery
1983 XR-1000S to XR-1000RX Project Build Thread
|

15th December 2022
|
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Midlands UK
Posts: 1,922 Sportster/Buell Model: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year: 1976 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year #2: 74/5
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Kl
Nice project Paul and a very good result. I am exactly doing the same thing with my Sporty 78. I have an Kawa front end including the wheels and brakes. Only difference is that I use the stock rear swing arm with an ZX front wheel. Also the rear end will be an shorter version. Thanks for the inspiration. Greetings Paul
|
Good to hear my project provided some inspiration. My swingarm has the original pivot but from there on back it's new. Your build sounds interesting, you should start up a build thread, it would be good to see.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 84rzv500r
very nice.. I like the look and the improved suspension...
|
Thanks. The rear suspension so far doesn't really seem better or worse, just different. I do really like the look though. The front though is definitely far better.
Paul
__________________
|

15th December 2022
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 8,580 Sportster/Buell Model: XLB, XLCH, Sporton Sportster/Buell Year: 1962 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1966 Other Motorcycle Model: XLCH (Another one) Other Motorcycle Year: 1966
|
|
The deficiencies in the rear swing arm don't show up at slower speeds. The early round tube forks (I just don't know how strong the later square section are) just aren't strong enough at high speed.
The rear suspension has 3 deficiencies from an engineering standpoint.
1. the arms are made with "too thin" tubes allowing some flex.
2. The pivot point is too narrow.
The problems show up at high speed when precessional forces are strong enough to come into play complicating the whole thing.
If you stand behind the bike and imagine what happens when you twist the fork. The tire contact point will move. When this happens while your cornering it means the front wheel and the rear wheel are now traveling on two different arcs. That's not great for a start. But when you tilt the rear wheel over precessional forces change the lean angle of the bike. The bike will begin to "self correct" as the front wheel hasn't changed it''s axis.
The net effect is the bike "wallows" trying to find an equilibrium between the two competing forces.
At slower speeds there simply isn't enough force being generated to twist the arms. Except of course when you hit a big bump or pothole. A perfect swing arm will just absorb the shock and the only sideways "slip" will be fur to lack of traction as the rear wheel is unloaded.
Some will see this as "technobabble" but it's what happens and as long as your arms have been made strong enough it will improve the suspension at higher speeds.
The Sportster (K Model) frame was accepted practice in 1950. But shortly thereafter the McCandless Brothers invented the Featerbed frame making the Harley frame obsolete.
To be fair it wasn't until the 1980's that other manufacturers caught on and we got Deltaboxes and Trellis frames.
__________________
"I know only too well the evil that I propose. But my inclinations get the better of me."
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45.
|