Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
Keep & Kill
Last Post: Crusty
Posted On: 2 Hours Ago
Replies: 34,235
Views: 2,139,397
....1
Last Post: Graywolf
Posted On: 2 Hours Ago
Replies: 6,456
Views: 406,813
|
Members Birthdays
|
|
View Poll Results: which do you prefer?
|
Vance & Hines
|
  
|
142 |
47.65% |
Screamin' Eagle Slash Cuts
|
  
|
57 |
19.13% |
Get a 2-1 already...
|
  
|
88 |
29.53% |
Who care's about HP, Get some LOUD Drags..
|
  
|
19 |
6.38% |

5th June 2008
|
 |
XL FORUM LIFE MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MARY Lund, YUK !
Posts: 15,587 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH-1208 Sportster/Buell Year: 1997
|
|
Dyno Run, V&H straight shots vs. Screamin' Eagles
I posted this in the sticky, but I wanted to get some feedback as well as provide some information between the pipes.
Vance & Hines Straight Shots (Baffled with a lollipop)
Screamin' Eagle Slash Cut with Moddified Baffles (Holes cut out in baffles)
Screamin Eagle 1200 Heads 61cc 10° dome
.010 over 10° dome pistons
Screamin' Eagle 1200 Ignition.
Screamin' Eagle Air Box (original) with K&N filter
Stock Carb
Stock Cam
Stock Wires
__________________
States I've Ridden in
71.3 hp 70.8 tq
1208cc 11.09:1 (Wiseco 10° Dome 10.5:1 .010 over) ,Screamin Eagle Dual Plug Heads (10° 61cc), Original SE A/C, Vance & Hines Straight Shots w/ Custom Baffles. SE 6800 ign, Dual BREMBO brakes/ Pirelli Night Dragon MU85-16 Rear - 100/90-19 Front. Progressive Springs & 412 HD 13½" Chrome Shocks, 5½" pullback riser w/ "reddtigger mount", Stebel Nautilus Compact Air horn, Mustang Vintage Super Wide Touring Seat, Alto Carbonite Clutch
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 7,764 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH 1200 Sportster/Buell Year: 1988
|
|
I not that impressed with the bottom end below 3300 rpm. With stock cams and that high of compression it seems like it should be at least 5 hp more? My experience with SE slip ons was about the same. I lost bottom end too.
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 5,281 Sportster/Buell Model: N/A Sportster/Buell Year: N/A Other Motorcycle Model: FXDL Low Rider Other Motorcycle Year: 2007
|
|
I must say I like the torque of the V & H. But will a difference of 1-3 hp or ft/lbs really be that significant? I'd be making aesthetic decisions at this point, personally. Between those two, I like the look of the slash cuts over the straight shots. (You were wanted opinions like this, yes?)
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 7,764 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH 1200 Sportster/Buell Year: 1988
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wandrur
I must say I like the torque of the V & H. But will a difference of 1-3 hp or ft/lbs really be that significant? I'd be making aesthetic decisions at this point, personally. Between those two, I like the look of the slash cuts over the straight shots. (You were wanted opinions like this, yes?)
|
In a side by side roll on 3 hp looks huge.
From the choices allowed in this poll I vote for V&H because of looks, and the fact that they work pretty good. I don't like 2:1, I guess you all know that by now. Anyone that says HP doesn't matter is lying to themselves.
|

5th June 2008
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,372 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200 Custom Sportster/Buell Year: 2005
|
|
Looks like you're runnin' just a bit lean. I wonder what would happen to those numbers if you shim the needle up one notch. I bet they'd improve a horse or 3...and improve the torque number...
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 5,073 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200C Sportster/Buell Year: 2006
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot Rod Sporty
Looks like you're runnin' just a bit lean. I wonder what would happen to those numbers if you shim the needle up one notch. I bet they'd improve a horse or 3...and improve the torque number...
|
The AFR on the Graphs shows RICH, not Lean.
|

5th June 2008
|
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,372 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1200 Custom Sportster/Buell Year: 2005
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lenster
The AFR on the Graphs shows RICH, not Lean.
|
You're right. My bad.... 
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
XL FORUM LIFE MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MARY Lund, YUK !
Posts: 15,587 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH-1208 Sportster/Buell Year: 1997
|
|
the bike was set a little rich, so that when I got down to sea level, it'll be right on the money.
|

5th June 2008
|
 |
XL FORUM LIFE MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MARY Lund, YUK !
Posts: 15,587 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH-1208 Sportster/Buell Year: 1997
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by biknut
In a side by side roll on 3 hp looks huge.
From the choices allowed in this poll I vote for V&H because of looks, and the fact that they work pretty good. I don't like 2:1, I guess you all know that by now. Anyone that says HP doesn't matter is lying to themselves.
|
I'm not worried about a 3 hp at the MAX of the scale. when I'll roll it on, it'll be just about the same. with a little more torque..
Torque gets you going,
HP keeps you going.
|

6th June 2008
|
 |
Senior Master Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 7,764 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH 1200 Sportster/Buell Year: 1988
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReddTigger
I'm not worried about a 3 hp at the MAX of the scale. when I'll roll it on, it'll be just about the same. with a little more torque..
Torque gets you going,
HP keeps you going.
|
A lot of roll on's start at about 50-60 mph. I'm just saying it looks a little weak down there for stock cams and high compression. Maybe about 5 HP.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:30.
|