Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
Members Birthdays
|
|

3 Hours Ago
|
 |
Asgardian
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Deck of Me boat
Posts: 8,529 Sportster/Buell Model: 883r Sportster/Buell Year: 2003 Other Motorcycle Model: Chris Craft 32 Other Motorcycle Year: abov
|
|
Do i have to have papers ( signed in triplicate, queried, sent back, commissioned and at last approved ) for pan galactic travel...hell no, because i am a rebel Dottie.
Honk, Honk!
__________________
|

3 Hours Ago
|
 |
Asgardian
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Deck of Me boat
Posts: 8,529 Sportster/Buell Model: 883r Sportster/Buell Year: 2003 Other Motorcycle Model: Chris Craft 32 Other Motorcycle Year: abov
|
|
Can't wait for the Los Angeles death by covid bullets numbers to come out.
|

2 Hours Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Let Freedom Ring in PA
Posts: 8,285 Sportster/Buell Model: Sportster 883►1200 Sportster/Buell Year: 1994
|
|
I posted the death statistics for 2020 on page 36 (Post# 1060 & 1065) of this very long thread.
Different people will assess the risk in different ways. Which is why everyone should be able to decide for themselves whether to isolate from others on the planet.
If you know there are bears in the woods, do you go into the woods? Many do. - Or, do you consider any risk of being mauled or eaten by a bear sufficient to isolate from ever going into the woods?
People commit crimes in the woods. If you go into the woods, there is a chance of being the victim of a crime. Is this sufficient reason to ban people from going into the woods? Or should you make up your own mind whether you want to assume the risk from others and go into the woods.
People can be tested as negative and ten minutes later be exposed and catch the coronavirus. Should people be tested ever 9 minutes to prevent the potential 10-minute exposure? Should everyone be locked in an environmentally sealed pod to prevent any possible exposure? What level of risk is acceptable?
"If just one death could be prevented" would that justify shutting down all of life, and keeping everyone isolated forever - To save one life? Simply living has some level of risk (tree limbs, tornadoes, floods, etc, etc, etc).
The PANIC that has been promulgated from this coronavirus is beyond sensibility. No discussion has taken place (either in the public arena nor in the professional think tanks) regarding WHAT LEVEL OF RISK IS ACCEPTABLE?
__750 Thousand Deaths__ occured during 2020 (age 15-64) UNRELATED TO the Coronavirus!
IXL _______ >>>> My Motorcycle Chronicles Are Here <<<<
__________________
### The ride is more enjoyable to nowhere in particular! ###
Last edited by IXL2Relax; 2 Hours Ago at 19:03..
|

2 Hours Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,434 Sportster/Buell Model: 883 Xl Sportster/Buell Year: 1992
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IXL2Relax
I posted the death statistics for 2020 on page 36 (Post# 1060 & 1065) of this very long thread.
Different people will assess the risk in different ways. Which is why everyone should be able to decide for themselves whether to isolate from others on the planet.
If you know there are bears in the woods, do you go into the woods? Many do. - Or, do you consider any risk of being mauled or eaten by a bear sufficient to isolate from ever going into the woods?
IXL _______ >>>> My Motorcycle Chronicles Are Here <<<<
|
Exactly, good info you posted back there.
2.8 million peeps died in the US in 2019.
#scamdemic #fearMongering
Sent from mask free Iowa
|

42 Minutes Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,925 Sportster/Buell Model: 1200R Sportster/Buell Year: 2005 Other Motorcycle Model: 5 bikes and 1 quad
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportsterpaul
I’m curious, and hung up , on Covid death numbers. I wonder what they might be if it required a positive test result to count vs. a”symptom “ to qualify. Somewhere in the back of my mind,(a scary place), when the government, that’s really our tax dollars, pays money for Covid deaths it’s tempting for the death rate to rise perhaps a bit artificially? I don’t deny the severity and gravity of the pandemic, just leery of the numbers. Rant over carry on.....
|
Paul, there is an entire huge conspiracy claim regarding money paid out for covid deaths. As with anything else, the truth is far less interesting than the claims. It would take a lifetime for one person to research all the nonsense that the computer age is spreading. Hospitals are given more for certain procedures, etc. and that applies even when there is no pandemic to cause rampant internet gossip.
|

37 Minutes Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 11,925 Sportster/Buell Model: 1200R Sportster/Buell Year: 2005 Other Motorcycle Model: 5 bikes and 1 quad
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by IXL2Relax
I posted the death statistics for 2020 on page 36 (Post# 1060 & 1065) of this very long thread.
Different people will assess the risk in different ways. Which is why everyone should be able to decide for themselves whether to isolate from others on the planet.
If you know there are bears in the woods, do you go into the woods? Many do. - Or, do you consider any risk of being mauled or eaten by a bear sufficient to isolate from ever going into the woods?
People commit crimes in the woods. If you go into the woods, there is a chance of being the victim of a crime. Is this sufficient reason to ban people from going into the woods? Or should you make up your own mind whether you want to assume the risk from others and go into the woods.
People can be tested as negative and ten minutes later be exposed and catch the coronavirus. Should people be tested ever 9 minutes to prevent the potential 10-minute exposure? Should everyone be locked in an environmentally sealed pod to prevent any possible exposure? What level of risk is acceptable?
"If just one death could be prevented" would that justify shutting down all of life, and keeping everyone isolated forever - To save one life? Simply living has some level of risk (tree limbs, tornadoes, floods, etc, etc, etc).
The PANIC that has been promulgated from this coronavirus is beyond sensibility. No discussion has taken place (either in the public arena nor in the professional think tanks) regarding WHAT LEVEL OF RISK IS ACCEPTABLE?
__750 Thousand Deaths__ occured during 2020 (age 15-64) UNRELATED TO the Coronavirus!
IXL _______ >>>> My Motorcycle Chronicles Are Here <<<<
|
If you take your examples and reverse the story line to be that you are endangering the bears by your presence in the woods, this example would apply, but as I have stated near a billion times in here, the mask is to protect the bears. So if bears were susceptible (and had equal protection under our constitution), it still would not be your right to go into the forest without a mask.
|

24 Minutes Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,434 Sportster/Buell Model: 883 Xl Sportster/Buell Year: 1992
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wedge
If you take your examples and reverse the story line to be that you are endangering the bears by your presence in the woods, this example would apply, but as I have stated near a billion times in here, the mask is to protect the bears. So if bears were susceptible (and had equal protection under our constitution), it still would not be your right to go into the forest without a mask.
|
Glad I’m not a beer or a walking radiation Chernobyl glow stick, just a free man in a free country. Ahhhhhh
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (1 members and 4 guests)
|
madnss
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:18.
|