Main Menu
|
|
Active Threads
|
Keep & Kill
Last Post: Crusty
Posted On: 37 Minutes Ago
Replies: 34,176
Views: 2,134,950
....1
Last Post: Graywolf
Posted On: 15 Hours Ago
Replies: 6,438
Views: 406,557
|
|
Members Birthdays
|
tom32, shaky jake (70), pepper (67), Farseeker (66), Nibelungen (56), Mike-883R (53), cbrunson (48), jcs75sporty (48), Locust (46), bob1610 (41), bigsporty1 (40), ImAHighSamurai (37), OleEven (36), ofaloto.tupi (36), mitch32592 (31) |
|
2 Days Ago
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sunshine Coast
Posts: 8,681 Sportster/Buell Model: XLB, XLCH, Sporton Sportster/Buell Year: 1962 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1966 Other Motorcycle Model: XLCH (Another one) Other Motorcycle Year: 1966
|
|
GH, most serious type people will notice the two inta's immediately think, this guy is into performance. S&S air cleaners being a secondary clue.
Performance, But only in a straight line. The BT's simply don't have enough clearance on the left side to get it around corners at speed. There's not enough weight on the front end to start with so lifting the frame/engine is just going to make the whole plot worse.
I think a lot of people don't realise that's how "Choppers" started. Longer front ends to try and get some ground clearance. People then just got stupid by imitating what they saw but trying to outdo each other.
__________________
"I know only too well the evil that I propose. But my inclinations get the better of me."
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47.
|
