Main Menu
|
Active Threads
|
....1
Last Post: Graywolf
Posted On: 6 Minutes Ago
Replies: 6,440
Views: 406,575
|
Members Birthdays
|
tom32, shaky jake (70), pepper (67), Farseeker (66), Nibelungen (56), Mike-883R (53), cbrunson (48), jcs75sporty (48), Locust (46), bob1610 (41), bigsporty1 (40), ImAHighSamurai (37), OleEven (36), ofaloto.tupi (36), mitch32592 (31) |
|

17th April 2021
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 87 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH 883 Sportster/Buell Year: 1993
|
|
61 inches is a traditional harley size, and will have enough grunt with 4 valve heads
|

17th April 2021
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Loxahatchee, FL (S. FL)
Posts: 2,135 Sportster/Buell Model: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year: 2003 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XL Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1981 Other Motorcycle Model: FXDC Other Motorcycle Year: 2013
|
|
61" in my opinion would be big enough to create a light, well-handling fast bike
Did I say light?
Looking at the first xl's 420 lbs approx?
With power comes weight. Shoot for 100 kilo wet!
__________________
Steve
'81 Andrews "Y" cams, K. Black 9-1 pistons
'03 1250 NRHS stage two Lightning heads, SE536 cams, mik flat slide 42
'01 Cyclone stock
'13 FXDC 96" stock
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:15.
|