View Full Version : For those in California Print this and carry it with you


Spor-T-1
11th January 2006, 05:48
hey all been doing some research and found this incredibly interesting article of Question and answer.

CHP Exhaust



In response to complaints from SEMA and aftermarket exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations for use by all interested parties. The new guidelines make clear that aftermarket exhaust modifications do not in and of themselves violate muffler noise regulations unless the modifications result in noise levels exceeding California's 95-decibel limit.

SEMA and CHP have agreed to educate police officers, consumers and the industry to ensure a clear understanding of the proper exhaust noise limits and enforcement standards. SEMA's goal is to reduce improper citations and encourage modifications that comply with the regulations. It is the responsibility of aftermarket manufacturers to design and test products to ensure they comply with the regulation. We recommend that manufacturers distribute compliance information about their products and the enclosed SEMA summaries to educate consumers about their rights and responsibilities under California's regulations. Feel free to copy and distribute the enclosed materials.

In the coming months, we will compile information on enforcement actions brought to our attention. We urge you to report to us any experiences your customers have with unfair citations. We are hopeful that the guidelines will inform police officers about proper enforcement standards and procedures; if the guidelines prove ineffective in practice, we will undertake other measurers to seek fair enforcement of the regulations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, email stevemac@sema.org.

Top
CHP Exhaust Noise Guidelines at a Glance



Responding to complaints from SEMA and custom exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued a new bulletin clarifying state exhaust noise regulations. The Bulletin (CHP Information Bulletin 98-100) contains the following information:

Contrary to some citations issued recently, exhaust modifications that increase noise are not automatically illegal in California. The regulations allow exhaust modifications increasing noise up to 95 decibels. The California Vehicle Code does not prohibit exhaust modifications, modified tailpipes or muffler tips which increase exhaust noise levels over that of factory-installed systems as long as noise levels do not exceed the 95-decibel limit. Because California does not provide for practical roadside testing, enforcement stops will continue to require an officer's informed evaluation. CHP advises officers to issue "Notice to Correct" (fix-it tickets) when vehicles are judged in violation of the noise standard. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to nullify the citation by presenting materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95-decibel standard. Although CHP lacks resources to verify manufacturer claims, it is aware that many custom exhausxt systems meet the 95-decibel standard. The bulletin advises that police officers consider specialty equipment documentation when evaluating exhaust systems for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket. California exhaust noise regulations apply statewide, prohibiting local authorities from adopting local noise limitations that differ from the state regulation. Citations issued under differing local ordinances are invalid.

For additional information, email stevemac@sema.org.

Top
Exhaust Noise Standard



CHP Information Bulletin: An Exhaust Noise Standard to Guide Enforcement Offices, Specialty Equipment Manufacturers and Consumers

The California Highway Patrol (CHP), working with manufacturers and the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations. CHP Information Bulletin No. 98-100 informs CHP and local officers, industry and consumers on applicable noise limits and allowable custom exhaust modifications.

Where To Find It: The following indicates the paragraph # (e.g., Q2) in the CHP Bulletin containing key information to support specialty equipment manufacturers and consumers on legal exhaust modifications.

The Bulletin acknowledges that exhaust modifications that increase noise may be legal under California regulations and that exhaust systems which meet a 95-decibel noise limit (13 CCR 1036(d)(1)), are deemed to comply with California's modified exhaust enforcement provisions (Vehicle Code Sections 27150 and 27151). [Q2 & Q10]. The document also advises that the California Vehicle Code does not automatically prohibit modifications that increase exhaust system noise levels over that of factory-installed systems. [Q2].

Industry representatives and the CHP have pledged to educate interested parties about California's applicable noise limits and proper enforcement standards. Because current regulations do not provide for practical roadside noise testing, enforcement stops will require an officer's informed, professional evaluation. [Q2]. The Bulletin notes that CHP lacks resources to independently verify manufacturer claims, but is aware there are custom systems that meet the noise levels specified in 1036(d)(1), CCR 13. An officer may consider specialty equipment manufacturer documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket pursuant to a "Notice to Correct" citation (Vehicle Code Section 40610(b)). [Q13].

The following summarizes the Bulletin's guidelines with regard to custom exhaust systems and enforcement of California's noise regulations:

Exhaust Noise Limits: California regulations contain a number of sections specifying permissible vehicle noise levels. The Bulletin advises that passenger car exhaust systems [Q9] that comply with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR are deemed to comply with Vehicle Code enforcement Sections 27150 and 27151, governing mufflers and exhaust system modifications. [Q10]. The exhaust noise provisions in 1036(d)(1) establish a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, at a specified speed typically between 3000 and 5000 rpm (see regulations for details). [Q9]. Exhaust system modifications are permitted to increase noise above the level of original factory installed systems as long as the 95-decibel limit is not exceeded. [Q10].

Statewide Noise Standard: The Bulletin advises that Section 21 of the Vehicle Code makes the Code applicable and uniform throughout the state, prohibiting local authorities from adopting additional noise limitations, unless expressly authorized. Citations issued under any such local ordinances are therefore invalid. [Q12]. Modified Exhaust Systems: A custom, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip does not automatically constitute a violation of Vehicle Code Section 27151. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels. [Q4]. There are no regulations that require configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle which does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151. [Q4].

"Fix-it" Ticket: Concerning enforcement action on excessive noise, the Bulletin recommends using CHP 281 "Notice to Correct" or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)" unless disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present. [Q14]. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to present materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95dB(A) standard and seek to have the citation nullified.

Top
CHP Information Bulletin No. 98-100



Excessive Noise Enforcement Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks and Motorcycles

The California Highway Patrol (CHP), Commercial Vehicle Section (CVS), has received many inquiries about excessive noise emitted by passenger vehicles, light trucks and motorcycles. Enforcement personnel and the public have inquired regarding enforcement of the Vehicle Code (VC) sections pertaining to excessive noise emitted by these vehicles.

Excessive noise is primarily a nuisance issue rather than a safety concern, and determination of excessive noise is subjective. For this reason, enforcement personnel are to exercise sound professional judgment in making a determination of violation. The following guidelines and attached question and answer sheet (Attachment A) provide guidance to enforcement personnel regarding appropriate enforcement procedures.

Enforcement Guidelines

The only drivers who should be cited are those whose vehicles:

1. Are not equipped with a muffler;
2. Clearly emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, or;
3. Have a clearly defective exhaust system (holes, leaks, etc.).

Clearing Citations

When clearing excessive noise citations issued by the CHP or allied agencies, personnel are to consider exhaust systems in compliance if they incorporate a reasonably effective muffler, do not emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, and appear to be in good repair. ATTACHMENT A

Q1: Doesn't the VC require a muffler on every vehicle?

Yes. Section 27150 VC requires that every motor vehicle subject to registration be equipped with an adequate muffler. There are no exceptions — all vehicles must be equipped with a muffler, as defined in Section 425 VC. A turbocharger is not considered a muffler.

Q2: Aren't all exhaust system modifications prohibited?

No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of the exhaust system to amplify or increase the noise emitted by the vehicle, making the vehicle not in compliance with Section 27150 VC or exceeding the noise limits established in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Section 27151 VC does not prohibit all modifications to an exhaust system. It also does not prohibit all modifications that increase the noise level of the exhaust system over that of the original, factory-installed exhaust system (as it did until 1980). It only prohibits modifications that result in a noise level higher than those specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Accurately determining compliance with Sections 27201-27206 VC for enforcement purposes is generally impractical. Enforcement personnel must make an informed professional evaluation to determine if excessive noise statutes are being violated.

Q3: Do I have to actually listen to a vehicle to cite it for a violation of either Section 27150 or 27151?

Yes. Drivers of vehicles should not be cited for violation of either Section 27150 or 27151 VC unless the officer has personally listened to the vehicle in operation. This can be either under actual driving conditions or with the vehicle stationary and the engine running. Even if the officer has inspected the exhaust system and does not see a muffler present, the officer should listen to the vehicle. The purpose of this is to be sure that the exhaust system does not incorporate internally baffled pipes or other components that meet the definition of a muffler. There are no specifications which state required configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle that does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.

Q4: Does an aftermarket, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip constitute a violation of Section 27151 VC?

No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of exhaust systems to amplify or increase noise. The officer would have to establish that the modification increased the noise emitted by the vehicle by listening to the exhaust. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels.

Q5: Since Section 27150 requires that the muffler prevent excessive and unusual noise, can the driver of a vehicle be cited for violation of Section 27150 if it emits a sound different than the original factory installed muffler?

No. The prohibition against unusual noise refers to noises that are unusual for motor vehicles. Noise that may be unusual for a particular make or model of vehicle, but which is not necessarily unusual for other motor vehicles, should not be considered in violation, provided the noise is not excessive.

Q6: Aren't all modified exhaust systems unlawful under pollution control laws?

No. Current pollution control laws regarding aftermarket exhaust systems are quite complex, but do permit the installation of a variety of aftermarket and "exempt" systems. Due to the complexity of modern pollution control systems and the laws governing them, the CHP does not provide technical training in this area. Enforcement of pollution control laws is the responsibility of the Bureau of Automotive Repair through the "Smog Check" program.

Q7: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC? Can these be used to cite loud vehicles?

No. Section 27200 VC prohibits the sale of new motor vehicles that exceed the noise limits specified in these Sections. The specified noise limits (80 dB(A) (decibels) for all new cars, pickup trucks, vans and motorcycles apply only to new motor vehicles, under full throttle acceleration tests, measured 50 feet from the test vehicle, as specified in Sections 1040-1044, 1046 and 1047, Title 13, California Code of Regulations (13 CCR). These noise levels and the specified test methods apply to manufacturers and new car dealers only, for new vehicle certification purposes, and may not be used for enforcement purposes against vehicles being operated on public roadways. The CHP is not aware of any significant violation of Section 27200 VC by vehicle manufacturers or dealers.

Q8: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC and how can they be enforced?

Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC specify noise standards for vehicles operating on the highway (in-use vehicles), and are intended for use in actual traffic conditions. The limits of Section 23130 apply under all conditions of grade, load, acceleration and deceleration. The lower limits of Section 23130.5 apply only to relatively level roadways and under conditions of relatively constant speed. They specifically do not apply to areas of congested traffic that require noticeable acceleration or deceleration, or within 200 feet of an official traffic control device or change in grade. Although these sections were intended for use in actual traffic conditions, the complexities of noise testing require the testing be conducted in a relatively large open area free of other vehicles and large sound-reflecting objects. This makes in-use vehicle noise testing in most developed areas impractical, where noise complaints are most likely to occur. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct vehicle noise testing. Enforcement using Section 27150 or 27151 VC is usually more appropriate and effective.

Q9: What is the exhaust noise test specified in 13 CCR? Can this be used for enforcement?

Sections 1030-1036, 13 CCR, were intended to be used by Licensed Muffler Certification Stations as a means of determining if an exhaust system met the requirements of the Muffler Certification Program (when those programs were operational). They specify testing procedures for motor vehicle exhaust noise alone (as opposed to total vehicle noise). This procedure specifies a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, typically at a speed of 3000-5000 rpm. (For comparison, a modern rotary lawn mower with a 5-horsepower Briggs & Stratton engine typically emits approximately 93 dB(A) at the same distance at full speed under no load.) It applies only to passenger vehicles. It does not apply to motorcycles or to vehicles over 6000 pounds gross weight.

Q10: Can this test be used in enforcement?

Not readily. Although much simpler than the test methods specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC, this test method still requires some technical expertise and a means to determine both the speed (rpm) of the engine under test (tachometer) and the rpm at which maximum horsepower of the engine is developed (information which may not always be readily available), as well as a sound level meter. It is not intended for roadside noise testing. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct exhaust noise testing. This test is useful, however, for determining if an aftermarket or performance exhaust system complies with VC requirements. It should be noted that the 95 dB(A) level, because it is intended as a simple "go-no-go" type of test, may permit exhaust noise somewhat higher than those permitted under Sections 27201-27206 VC. An exhaust system that complies with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR, is deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.

Q11: What happened to the Muffler Certification and the Licensed Muffler Certification Station Programs?

Funding for both programs was terminated in 1979. There are currently no Official Muffler Certification Stations, no listing of certified mufflers and no formal mechanism in place to conduct objective vehicle or exhaust noise testing.

Q12: Can local authorities enact or enforce more strict ordinances regarding vehicle noise?

No. Section 21 VC makes the VC applicable and uniform throughout the state, and prohibits local authorities from enacting or enforcing any ordinance on the matters covered by the VC unless expressly authorized to do so. In-use vehicle noise is addressed in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC. There is no provision in the VC that permits local authorities to adopt additional noise limitations. Consequently, citations issued under such ordinances are invalid.

Q13: Some aftermarket exhaust systems include documentation that the system has been tested and found to meet the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. Are those legal?

The CHP does not have the resources to independently verify manufacturer's claims, but is aware that some aftermarket exhaust systems do meet the noise levels specified in Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. An officer may consider such documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during the issuance of a citation and when clearing a citation pursuant to Section 40610(b) VC.

Q14: What type of enforcement action should be taken against vehicles emitting excessive noise?

Providing none of the disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present, the use of the CHP 281, "Notice to Correct," or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on the CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)," would be appropriate for these violations.

82ndJumper
11th January 2006, 06:51
Thanks for the info

Moker
11th January 2006, 07:33
dammit anyhow

:(

still gotta fix my dam ticket

midnitewolf
11th January 2006, 09:23
The problem is it's the city police dept's that are doing the enforcing
not the CHP so the criteria for enforcment changes . The main factor
is noise but that is also changing , the city of Long Beach is checking
exhaust systems for the EPA stamp on the muffler (all factory exhaust
has one ) which results in being cited for non compliance of EPA laws.
I'm sure it won't be long before all the coastal cities will start doing the
same thing .

I don't belive the problem is about loud pipes as it is the well to do
money people of these communities not wanting a motorcyclist
element in there community .

midnitewolf
11th January 2006, 09:30
Heres an article from the LA Times about Laguna Beach and loud pipes
and how it is being enforced.

Here is a aryicle from LA Times

Making Bikers Pipe Down
Armed with a decibel meter, a Laguna Beach police officer works to rid
the city's streets of noisy motorcycles. He's a hero to some, an
irritation to others.
By Hector Becerra
Times Staff Writer

December 18, 2005

A month after rolling out of Austin, Texas, on his Harley-Davidson,
Zack Padilla could boast of plenty of air-through-the-hair biker
adventures.

His friend ran over a deer as they rode out of biker mecca Sturgis, S.D.

Padilla, a Charles Schwab server administrator, spied plumes of
wildfires in Idaho, took a tumble on a snowy road in Oregon and
rambled past the mighty redwoods of Northern California.

"I had a sense of being in 'The Lord of the Rings,' " the burly
black-leather-clad, goateed biker said. "I thought 'Treebeard' was
going to come out and talk to me.' "

Then at mile 4,666 of his adventure, as he rolled into the artsy town
of Laguna Beach, Padilla ran into the "Wall of Sound."

That is, Officer Tom Wall, 60, keeper of the decibel meter.

A fit retired Marine with a buzz cut, Wall stepped off the curb and
waved for Padilla, 33, to park his Springer Softail on the side of
Pacific Coast Highway. The chopper's exhaust system rattled like a
shivering giant's jaw.

"Now, if you give it a little bit of gas for me in neutral," Wall
asked, as he pointed the sound measuring device at the motorcycle's
exhaust pipe.

The motorcycle let out a roar. The numbers on the sound meter jumped
into the triple digits.

"Your motorcycle noise level is 117.5," Wall said.

"Cool," responded an impressed Padilla.

The citable limit in California is 95 decibels, Wall explained.

If Padilla represents today's Harley rider ¡X careerists who shed
button-down lives to play out "Easy Rider" fantasies ¡X then Wall
represents the response to all that motorcycle noise.

For many, the throaty growl of motorcycles has long been part of the
machines' appeal. So spiritually intertwined is sound to riding
motorcycles that in 1995 Harley-Davidson tried to trademark the
distinctive sound created by its V-twin motorcycle engines.

But with motorcycle ownership increasing by more than 34% since 1998,
this year has been marked by a growing concern that bike noise is
becoming a source of tension. Laguna Beach is far from the only place
to crack down: Police have also stepped up patrols along some favorite
biker routes, from the Sunset Strip in West Hollywood to Main Street
in Daytona Beach, Fla.

Hundreds of thousands of bikers streaming into Daytona Beach's Bike
Week this year were met with signs that read, "You're Back, We're
Glad!" and "Ride Quietly, Please," along with tighter enforcement of
noise ordinances. Some communities, including Myrtle Beach, S.C., are
considering shortening, rescheduling or even doing away with
motorcycle rallies.

The industry has taken notice of the complaints as never before.

In May, the 265,000 member American Motorcycle Assn. held its second
"noise summit" in Columbus, Ohio, to tackle an issue it said
represents the most pointed threat to bikers' rights.

"This is an issue which could affect our right to ride," said Tom
Lindsay, a spokesman for the group.

Lindsay mentioned a Louisville, Ky., restaurant he visited recently.
"They had a sign that said, 'No helicopters, horse trailers or
motorcycles,' " Lindsay said. "That was very clever¡K. That was very
disappointing to us, but it's also the handwriting on the wall."

Harley-Davidson has even asked dealers not to sell straight, unmuffled
exhaust pipes, and last year it removed Screaming Eagle parts that are
intended for off-street race use from its main catalogs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But in towns like Laguna Beach that are magnets for weekend bikers,
residents aren't waiting to see whether self-regulation works.

Laguna Beach relies on people like Wall, a foot soldier in the battle
against noise.

As he stood guard near a grassy area along Pacific Coast Highway,
Wall's eyes ¡X hidden by sunglasses ¡X scanned the busy street for
traffic scofflaws. His ears were attuned to any break from the normal
beach town sounds, the decibel meter often no farther away than a
six-shooter would be from a gunslinger.

"My standing here with this thing in my hand sends a message. As
people drive through, the legend continues to grow," Wall said with a
chuckle. "It takes the subjectivity out of the equation."

It didn't take Wall long to show that Padilla's bike was too loud.
Wall points the decibel meter 10 feet behind bikes' exhaust pipes and
asks riders to let their bikes idle before revving them to operating
or cruising rpm to get the maximum noise level.

Laguna Beach uses the California Highway Patrol's citable threshold of
95 decibels. An increase of 10 decibels may not seem like much, but
it's actually a twofold increase in sound, Wall said.

Padilla's bike, at 117.5 decibels, was four times as loud as the 95
considered the lawful limit, Wall said. The Texan could have been fined.

"My job is to sell the citation and make a point. I try to use as much
of what I call posture to get their attention and let them know I'm
serious," Wall said. "Once we've reached that understanding, that I'm
in charge, that this is my traffic stop and that this is how we're
going to do it, then I give them a couple of options."

In his time with the Marines, Wall flew more than 1,000 combat
missions in Vietnam and was shot down in seven helicopters. He was
shot in the arm, and a co-pilot lost his leg during one attack.

After leaving Vietnam, he taught such topics as military history and
leadership at the University of Minnesota during the 1970s, at a time
when there were frequent campus demonstrations against the military.

By day, Wall works at a global engineering company. But on weekends,
he dons his Laguna Beach police uniform. He joined the force nine
years ago after impressing department brass by being the only person
to complain about a street preacher who aggressively harassed
beachgoers. He works 100 hours a month, every Saturday and Sunday and
every holiday, and is paid about minimum wage.

For some bikers, many bent on conjuring a Steppenwolf,
anti-establishment image ¡X at least on weekends ¡X Wall is about as
establishment as it gets. To them, he is "RoboCop."

"It's ridiculous. They got one guy, an ex-military guy, and all he
does is write tickets," said Ruben Hummel, an Orange County
firefighter and Harley rider. "He's just badge-heavy. He just wants to
show his authority."

Wall extends his patrol to traffic scofflaws and distracted pedestrians.

Recently, when a woman pushing a baby stroller entered the crosswalk
just as the green signal was replaced by blinking red, he ordered her
back to the sidewalk. He told one man whose car poked past a crosswalk
line to avoid such intrusions in the future.

The owner of the Marine Room tavern, a popular biker hangout that
features roots-rock bands, said some bikers have vowed no longer to
visit Laguna Beach because of the city's and Wall's approach.

"He takes that approach that there's only black and white, no gray.
It's terrible," said Marine Room owner Kelly Boyd, a former Laguna
Beach councilman. "He takes no prisoners."

Boyd, a Vietnam veteran himself, said business has dropped since the
crackdowns began two years ago.

"On a good Sunday we used to have anywhere from 40 to 100 bikes out on
the street," Boyd said. "Now I hear we had 10 yesterday¡K. It's
affecting my business, and that irritates the hell out of me."

It's with a certain Joe Friday style that Wall patrols downtown Laguna
Beach, a colorful pastiche of restaurants, art galleries, high-fashion
stores, ice cream shops and bars.

He believes "people crave example and structure in their lives, and I
see it all the time. And I try to be a positive example for the other
police officers and for people in town and provide some structure."

For Wall, structure means anything from "stern warnings to a ticket."
A driver's license is a contract to adhere to certain rules, he said.

On the streets, he's by-the-book.

"You on the bikes ¡K those pipes are illegal," he recently told a
middle-aged man and woman riding Harley-Davidsons on Forest Avenue.
The woman's jaw dropped.

Laguna Beach City Councilwoman Toni Iseman is glad to hear that Wall
has a reputation for being tough on loud motorcycles.

"I think he's my hero," she said. "It's a cheap thrill for some of
these guys to make a lot of noise. People can't have conversations
when these guys go by en masse, and they think it's so cute to make
noise."

But because motorcyclists are a big part of Laguna's tourist economy,
not all merchants agree with Iseman. To critics, the city's noise
crackdown hurts business by driving away customers.

Once, after the anti-noise effort intensified, motorcyclists rode
through Iseman's neighborhood revving their engines. It appeared, said
Laguna Beach Police Chief James E. Spreine, that they were expressing
their displeasure at the councilwoman's stance on exhaust noise.

"I'm not a hard-nosed guy. I want some type of happy medium. I want a
win-win solution," Spreine said. "But I haven't been able to figure it
out."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond the crackdown, there has been much debate about Wall's methods.
To some bikers, he comes across as almost confrontational.

To cool tempers, Spreine recently asked Wall not to station himself
near the Marine Room because his presence might be seen as
inflammatory. The chief said he strongly supports Wall but thinks some
bikers are annoyed by his lectures.

Standing on the sidewalk outside the Marine Room, former police
officer Dennis Sanders, 53, of Foothill Ranch said some bikers go out
of their way to be loud.

"I don't blame the cops for writing tickets for people who are abusing
things, who rev their bikes, bikes with no baffles in them, stuff like
that," Sanders said. "But this one cop, he just sees Harleys coming
and he pulls them over¡K. You can't declare war on people with their
recreational vehicles, because this is a recreational town."

As he patrolled Pacific Coast Highway, Wall shrugged off such
comments. "As long as my granddaughters hug me and tell me they love
me," he said, "I don't care."

As a young Marine in the 1960s, he rode off-road motorcycles in the
Saddleback Mountain area with his buddies, he said. He has owned three
Harleys, including a Fat Boy and a Sportster.

"Riding a motorcycle is almost a cathartic experience," Wall said.
"It's a chance for freedom of expression. There's nothing better than
hopping on a motorcycle."

But he said he never for a second considered altering their exhaust
systems to make them louder ¡X or riding a bike without a full-face
helmet.

"I was old enough to see 'Easy Rider' in the movie theater, and that
whole approach in the '60s was completely against my character and
training," Wall said.

He said loud bikes have been known to irritate motorists into
violently lashing out against motorcyclists, so he views the issue as
one of public safety. Therefore, a bike he can hear from a block away
is a candidate for a traffic stop. "Like a small dog waiting for the
owner to come home ¡K my ears perk up," Wall said.

A spirited confrontation with an affluent biker from Newport Beach
prompted the department to buy the high-tech decibel meter that Wall
now uses.

Wall had given the biker a citation for having loud pipes. The
motorcyclist argued that the officer was making a subjective call and
that he had a constitutional right to express himself through his
bike, Wall recalled.

A hearing officer sided with the biker. Wall said it came down to a
judgment call, and the hearing officer did not feel there was a
definitive way of proving that the man's bike was too loud.

Enter the decibel meter ¡X or as some bikers have called it, according
to Wall, his "rectal thermometer." He still catches flak from many
bikers.

Wall said at least one wealthy motorcyclist told him he probably
"makes six times as much money" as the officer.

"I usually say, 'Well, you probably make more than that¡K. I just do
it for fun,' " Wall said, setting up a punch line. " 'I just love
writing tickets.' "


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It appeared that Zack Padilla was going to be getting one of those
tickets. Wall heard the rumble of his Springer Softail from a block
away on Pacific Coast Highway. Padilla was also wearing an allegedly
illegal helmet.

"I've never had anybody do a decibel meter on me in the state of Texas
or any of the other 20 states I've been through in the last three
weeks," Padilla said.

After checking Padilla's driving record and chatting about his trip,
Wall gave him back his driver's license and cautioned him that the
helmet he had bought at the Oregon border would not protect him in
case of a fall.

"People won't find you until the buzzards do," Wall said. Padilla
chuckled and nodded.

"You're clear, you've got a good driving record. I appreciate that,"
Wall said. "Zack, I appreciate your cooperation, and now you have a
nice trip."

A few minutes passed, and Padilla hopped onto his motorcycle. Then,
with a thundering roar, he rocketed back onto Pacific Coast Highway
and headed south.

This time, luck was on his side. Neither Wall nor the decibel meter
was in range.

Loco
11th January 2006, 19:52
I agree with midnitewolf. The well to do does not want any motorcycle elements in thier communities AND THIS IS THIER ANSWER TO ATTACKING US. They are using the EPA strangleholds even though the CHP has laid it out. In Long Beach, CA. in the poor areas (say Anaheim Street, Atlantic Blvd towards Wilmington) the cops and rich folks who run things do not give a sh-t. You venture to Ocean Blvd., Marina Drive, etc. and look out. They want Bikers out period!

It is not the CHP (as we read above) but the various/local city police departments. Huntington Beach, Laguna Beach, Hollywood (Sherrifs Dept.), Santa Monica and so forth have targeted bikers. Swicthing out pipes is a pain in the ass, but a necessary evil it's becoming. I was pulled over in Huntington Beach, CA and the Cop gave me a bunch of sh-t. I have SE Pro II's which are hardly close to the loudest pipes around. I stayed cool even though he was a young prick, he let me go with a warning and added "Don't ever come back to my city!" The Vietnam Vet I was riding with jumped in his sh-t bigtime and they threatened him with towing and jail.

Welcome to America...It all starts with the EPA and they are out to get rid of us all!

Loco
So. Cal.