This was one of the rare occasions that i pulled a 1.4 ish 60 foot....and look at what it did for my et.....it was 10.0 ish and that was off the gas big time at the traps...see how low the trap speed was....man ,that was a nine easy....never noticed that one before....its the yellow run.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v700/Narley/Harley%20racing/Goodtimeslips.jpg

hey nitro , read that time slip and give me the play by play....there is a lot going on in that one.....makes me smile....bracket racing.....
I am bike 14

Wow that's fast off the line.
In theory, that could've been a 9.7 sec. or faster run. :)

Times will always be better at mission. The track has claws and the elevation of the track is 24ft above sea level. I have been there when the DA is 750 ft BELOW sea level.

the run I am talking bout wasnt at mission. its the yellow slip from edmonton where its 2000 feet above sea level. look again that edmonton run was a wild pull.

Sorry I didn't read it right. Segment times indicate you were on a 9.94 run

two tenths faster at the 1/8th then a similar run that ended at only 3 hundretdhs faster and appears to be wto. Where did the 2 tenths go? Your estimate would mean the run ended only 1 tenth faster than it did... I figured 9.8 at least...nitrous bikes usually make good top end. Not that it really matters...its all just math now..... bike ran 135 mph out the back when the bottle and clutch were getting along.

Although you were 20cents faster at the eighth, you were only a dime faster at 1000. Most variations will be at the front of the track. The 1000 to 1/4 info is usually very consistant. I took the difference from the 1000 to 1/4 from the mission run, 1.729 and added it to the 1000 time for the run at BMP, that comes up with 9.942. That is assuming that you didn't lift before 1000.