View Full Version : Rubbermount_EVO exhaust noise
mickeyvex
30th July 2010, 22:54
So I got a new set of custom pipes that I fabed up on my stock 1200. The dealership did a stage one upgrade on it when I bought it. The pipes are an inch and three quarter 2-2 system that are 38 inches long with big city thunder monster baffles installed. The bike runs great except for a fumbling bumbling sound that is most apparent in second gear at 3800 rpm and disappear at 4k. I can’t tell if this is a characteristic of the pipes or a jetting problem. Thanks for the help.
Rico 05R
30th July 2010, 22:58
How about some pics? We are picture whores around here.
biknut
30th July 2010, 23:05
More than likely reversion. I'm a big fan of Thunder Monsters, but they're not that good stopping reversion on 2:2 pipes that don't have a balance tube.
You can tune a lot of it out with a bunch of work, but it will still have a serious power dip between 3 and 4 k. When the reversion happens you go really rich.
mickeyvex
30th July 2010, 23:06
gonna have to post that tomorrow. no access to a camera right now
Rico 05R
30th July 2010, 23:08
I agree with Biknut, if you are only getting this symptom in a 200 rpm range, it is most likely reversion.
mickeyvex
30th July 2010, 23:13
thanks for the input guys. can reversion cause any damage?
biknut
30th July 2010, 23:33
thanks for the input guys. can reversion cause any damage?
I'm not going to say it can't cause damage, but I wouldn't be too concerned about it.
mickeyvex
30th July 2010, 23:46
I'm not going to say it can't cause damage, but I wouldn't be too concerned about it.
perfect. thats all i need to know. :D thanks
wedge
31st July 2010, 12:14
I agree, rich is usually very safe, it just costs HP.
jharback
31st July 2010, 12:18
Yeah, it's almost certainly a reversion problem. Highly unlikely to be a jetting problem.
Big Al-1200c
31st July 2010, 13:39
sounds like the jetting might need to be looked over. might be a little rich like some one else said.
More than likely reversion. I'm a big fan of Thunder Monsters, but they're not that good stopping reversion on 2:2 pipes that don't have a balance tube.
question: by balance tube, you are talking about the cross-over pipe?
I ask because I thought that the cross over pipe is what made 2-2 pipes, well 2-2, with out it you would have dual pipes?
wedge
1st August 2010, 10:22
sounds like the jetting might need to be looked over. might be a little rich like some one else said.
question: by balance tube, you are talking about the cross-over pipe?
I ask because I thought that the cross over pipe is what made a 2-2 pipes, well,,, 2-2, with out it you would have dual pipes?
Interesting, and logical fine tuning of termonology. Makes sense, but I have not heard that distinction before, I'm interested in hearing if this is correct.
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.