The Sportster and Buell Motorcycle Forum Zipper's Performance  

Go Back   The Sportster and Buell Motorcycle Forum > SPORTSTER MOTORCYCLE ZONE > Sportster Motorcycle Era Specific and Model Specific > Ironhead Sportster Motorcycle Talk (1957-1985)
XLF Gallery XLF Classifieds XLF Blogs XLF Shout XLF Arcade XLF Disclaimer/Privacy Statement/Terms Of Use

Ironhead Sportster Motorcycle Talk (1957-1985) For all those that wanna talk about Ironhead Sportster Motorcycles

Members Birthdays
Bartman (49), robo524 (47), Killer-Velo CC, suarezrh (38), Dash (32)
DK Customs
Get Lowered
Biltwell
NRHS Performance Long 2

NRHS Performance Long 2
Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th May 2012
vyper202's Avatar
vyper202 vyper202 is offline
Master Mechanic
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 259
Sportster/Buell Model: XL
Sportster/Buell Year: 1977
Reputation: 1972
vyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura about
Cool Just some thoughts....

Well I was a little bored last night and was reflecting on my past sportys... a 1960 that was stroked and a 1973 that was stock except for 20 thousand over pistons/jugs.... The 1977 we have now, that has 750 miles on it since a total rebuild, engine and trans, just doesnt seem to be as strong as I remember the others. Im not comparing to the stroker, but the stock "73... they are set up almost identical... same carb and jets, same stock cams, same 2" open drags, same sprokets and rider weight almost identical. It seems the 77" is just weaker, dont get me wrong, its pretty darn peppy and runs great but the "73 would eat its lunch on takeoff and a 30 roll. So after reading some post and a little research, all info says the ironhead runs better with 1 3/4 drags with lollipops instead of the 2". I have installed the eye bolts in the 2" and it made no differance at all.
So last night I took an old set of 1 3/4" drags I had, cut the length down a little so they were the same length, installed the eye bolts and mounted them on the scoot half azz with old clamps so I can ride it a little to see if this changes anything.
Maybe there is just a differance in the early "70s sportys compared to the late "70s? for a little more power.... I know there is a slight horsepower differance in the year models...maybe Im just crazy... maybe I was just bored and wanted to find something to tinker with in the man cave... maybe I should just ride my Softail and leave my sons sporty alone....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th May 2012
chevelle's Avatar
chevelle chevelle is offline
Senior Bike Builder
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,996
Sportster/Buell Model: Custom Sputhe XR
Sportster/Buell Year: 19**
Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1965
Reputation: 9868
chevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of lightchevelle is a glorious beacon of light
Default

I.don't have much experience w/ drag pipes (for a reason) but...

Your right about eye bolts, they don't do a thing.
What you need is restrictive plate (large fender washer tacked to a bolt) in the pipe.
The lollipops needs to be about 3/4 the area of the open exhaust pipe.
If the plate is adjusted to be parallel to the pipe opening that will give you a noticable low end increase, but will hurt topend.
To get a happy medium, adjust plate to varying degrees until you are happy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by vyper202 View Post
Well I was a little bored last night and was reflecting on my past sportys... a 1960 that was stroked and a 1973 that was stock except for 20 thousand over pistons/jugs.... The 1977 we have now, that has 750 miles on it since a total rebuild, engine and trans, just doesnt seem to be as strong as I remember the others. Im not comparing to the stroker, but the stock "73... they are set up almost identical... same carb and jets, same stock cams, same 2" open drags, same sprokets and rider weight almost identical. It seems the 77" is just weaker, dont get me wrong, its pretty darn peppy and runs great but the "73 would eat its lunch on takeoff and a 30 roll. So after reading some post and a little research, all info says the ironhead runs better with 1 3/4 drags with lollipops instead of the 2". I have installed the eye bolts in the 2" and it made no differance at all.
So last night I took an old set of 1 3/4" drags I had, cut the length down a little so they were the same length, installed the eye bolts and mounted them on the scoot half azz with old clamps so I can ride it a little to see if this changes anything.
Maybe there is just a differance in the early "70s sportys compared to the late "70s? for a little more power.... I know there is a slight horsepower differance in the year models...maybe Im just crazy... maybe I was just bored and wanted to find something to tinker with in the man cave... maybe I should just ride my Softail and leave my sons sporty alone....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th May 2012
bobber58 bobber58 is offline
Senior Chief Know It All 1st Class
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,111
Sportster/Buell Model: XLH bobber
Sportster/Buell Year: 1964
Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLH
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1969
Other Motorcycle Model: Kawasaki ZX6E
Other Motorcycle Year: 1994
Reputation: 4542
bobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nice
Default

Depending on how they were/are set up, gearing has a big impact on this as well. The older XLCH's had deeper gearing in the transmission than the XLH, and there's a noticeable difference in roll on power between a 21 and 23 tooth front sprocket as well. So it may not be a weaker engine, it may just be a more parasitic way of getting the power to the rear wheel.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th May 2012
hugie03flhr hugie03flhr is offline
Flat Track Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 232
Sportster/Buell Model: Buell M2
Sportster/Buell Year: 2002
Reputation: 795
hugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enoughhugie03flhr will become famous soon enough
Default

Exhaust make a big difference but are the bikes geared the same and are you broken in yet on that motor? Some moly rings take 2-3000 miles before they are broken in and seal up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th May 2012
tracbike's Avatar
tracbike tracbike is offline
Senior Chief Know It All
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 853
Sportster/Buell Model: Sportster XLH
Sportster/Buell Year: 1974
Sportster/Buell Model #2: Sportster XLH
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1977
Other Motorcycle Model: Trac Dynamics / Razor,
Reputation: 520
tracbike will become famous soon enoughtracbike will become famous soon enoughtracbike will become famous soon enoughtracbike will become famous soon enoughtracbike will become famous soon enoughtracbike will become famous soon enough
Default

I agree with gearing, the early bike may have had a smaller sprocket. which would explain that punch at 30
Reply With Quote
Know Thy Hog

  #6  
Old 16th May 2012
bobber58 bobber58 is offline
Senior Chief Know It All 1st Class
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,111
Sportster/Buell Model: XLH bobber
Sportster/Buell Year: 1964
Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLH
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1969
Other Motorcycle Model: Kawasaki ZX6E
Other Motorcycle Year: 1994
Reputation: 4542
bobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nicebobber58 is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hugie03flhr View Post
Exhaust make a big difference but are the bikes geared the same and are you broken in yet on that motor? Some moly rings take 2-3000 miles before they are broken in and seal up.
If it takes 2-3000 miles to seat a set of moly rings, you have the wrong surface finish on the cylinder wall when you honed it. I've never seen a moly ring take more that about 30 minutes to fully seat. On a race engine using moly rings once they are fired up and the engine tuned it is ready to go. The rings are seated in the time it takes to check the carb and timing.

Now standard cast iron rings will take some time to seat, and can take up to 500 miles or so
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16th May 2012
Motorhead52's Avatar
Motorhead52 Motorhead52 is offline
Senior Chief Know It All 1st Class
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,107
Sportster/Buell Model: 883 sportster
Sportster/Buell Year: 2002
Other Motorcycle Model: BMW
Other Motorcycle Year: 1973
Reputation: 1561
Motorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura aboutMotorhead52 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Ever try dry top end rebuild? thats what I do

1 minute run at 3K RPM let cool over night

the rings seat and motor is oil tight for a long long time

cylinders are washed and dried ( flash rusted ) heads installed oiled, cylinders/piston and rings dry

motor can be used up to 70% of throttle for 250 miles then full 100% after

I use this method for all rebuild, its fast and reliable
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th May 2012
leadfootlambert's Avatar
leadfootlambert leadfootlambert is offline
Greasemonkey
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 119
Sportster/Buell Model: xlh 1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1975
Other Motorcycle Model: 03 FLHPI, 11 FLSTN
Reputation: 2478
leadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the roughleadfootlambert is a jewel in the rough
Default

Maybe the 73 had different cams than the 77? Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16th May 2012
vyper202's Avatar
vyper202 vyper202 is offline
Master Mechanic
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 259
Sportster/Buell Model: XL
Sportster/Buell Year: 1977
Reputation: 1972
vyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura aboutvyper202 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Like I said guys, its not weak by any means, just doesnt seem to as strong as it should. Maybe Im just getting older and want MO POWER! Im sure its fine for my 16 year old son...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th May 2012
85mm's Avatar
85mm 85mm is offline
Senior Chief Master Mechanic 1st Class
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 1,285
Sportster/Buell Model: XLCH (mongrel)
Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
Reputation: 3863
85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough85mm is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leadfootlambert View Post
Maybe the 73 had different cams than the 77? Just a thought.
Good thought. I think Q-cams were stock for 77, P-cams stock for 73.
__________________
BBRRAPPPP-snick-BRRAAAPPPP-snick-BBRRAAAPPPPP-snick-BBRAAAPPPPPP...
Reply With Quote
Know Thy Hog

Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Custom Search

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XL Forum - Linson Media LLC