Members Birthdays
|
Main Menu
|
|

10th December 2005
|
 |
Harley Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: central pa
Posts: 340 Sportster/Buell Model: xl1200c orange and black Sportster/Buell Year: 2008 Sportster/Buell Model #2: xl1200r traded on 08 Sportster/Buell Year #2: 2004
|
|
a question for you ironhead guys.
i was on www.americanclassicmotors.net and they have a 74 ironhead on there. why is the shifter on the right side of the bike and the brake on the left. i was just curious a guy work with has a 77 and his is not like that atleast i never notice it.
|

10th December 2005
|
 |
Senior Chief Harley Engineer 2nd Class
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brazil, Indiana
Posts: 1,679 Sportster/Buell Model: xlh Sportster/Buell Year: 1977 Sportster/Buell Model #2: xlh Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1981
|
|
77 is the first year for the new gear case with the shifter on the left side without having the linkage. They started putting them on the left in about 75 due to the feds mandating it. They used a linkage systemto switch them over till 77.
Hope this helps
P.S. dont buy anything from American Classic Motors I have heard very bad things about them.
|

10th December 2005
|
 |
Harley Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: central pa
Posts: 340 Sportster/Buell Model: xl1200c orange and black Sportster/Buell Year: 2008 Sportster/Buell Model #2: xl1200r traded on 08 Sportster/Buell Year #2: 2004
|
|
ok cool just like looking at the bikes on there thats all. thanks for the info.
|

10th December 2005
|
 |
Senior Chief Know It All
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: turtle creek, Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 853 Sportster/Buell Model: had an IRONHEAD XL Sportster/Buell Year: 1977
|
|
this was originally done to compete with british motorcycles. they still made the shifter on the right for a few more years, but there was a linkage you could put on to correct it.
|

10th December 2005
|
 |
Rider Of The Iron Steed
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: London, ON Canada
Posts: 24,000 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH Sportster/Buell Year: 1978
|
|
The shifter was on the right side because the bike was designed as a racing bike which would always go counter-clockwise around the track. They never used the brake. This kept the useless brake on the low side and the gear shifter on the high side.
|


10th December 2005
|
 |
Senior Custom Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,853 Sportster/Buell Model: 2001 883 Custom
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IronMick
The shifter was on the right side because the bike was designed as a racing bike which would always go counter-clockwise around the track. They never used the brake. This kept the useless brake on the low side and the gear shifter on the high side.
|
I've heard both versions of this phenomenon. Both sides swear it's the truth. Any way you slice it. The righty shift was just totally bitchin' cool. Wish they would have kept it.
|

11th December 2005
|
 |
Greasemonkey
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 111 Sportster/Buell Model: XLH 1000 Sportster/Buell Year: 1973 Other Motorcycle Model: Electra Glide Classic Other Motorcycle Year: 2002
|
|
just talk to any Jackpine Gypsies while your in Sturgis,, they'll tell ya!!!
|

11th December 2005
|
 |
Flat Track Racer
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 214 Sportster/Buell Model: FLHTC Sportster/Buell Year: 2007 Sportster/Buell Model #2: XLCH Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1973
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Irondrake77
this was originally done to compete with british motorcycles. they still made the shifter on the right for a few more years, but there was a linkage you could put on to correct it.
|
This is what I have always heard. I have never heard the explanation Mick offered. But who really knows besides the people at Harley.
I love my shifter on the right. It gives people that have never seen it something to talk about.
|

12th December 2005
|
|
Harley Engineer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 331
|
|
As I recall it went something like this, after WWII the HD WR racing version had the foot clutch on the left, spring loaded to assist in quick engagement, those models ran without any brakes on the 1/2 and mile tracks. The HD KR came out in 1953 and was a 750cc flathead, R designated the racing version. No brakes were used on this model except for Roadracing and TT courses. In the 70's when the AMA allowed the overhead valves twins to increase to 750 cc that was the end of the HD KR. Prior to this time all twins were restricted to 500 CC with overhead valves. the same rule applied to the 500cc ovh singles like BSA , Norton, etc. When the HD XR750 overhead valve came along it took a few years to get the bugs all worked out. This version actually made its first appearance by a privateer on a half mile with a destroked Sporster engine to bring the displacement down to 750cc. The XR 750 was also using a swingarm rear suspension and at that time brakes started showing up on these bikes. The rigid frames could not compete with them in chassis tuning. The shift lever and the brake lever were and still are , located on the right side of the bike. The HD's that we built had sheet metal primary covers to gain more ground clearance and less weight, the only thing on the left side of the bike was a very short rear set folding foot peg. Every attempt was made to get the bikes to lean over a far as possible without anything getting onto the track surface. At least that is the way I remember it.
|

12th December 2005
|
 |
Bike Builder
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sheboygan, WI
Posts: 1,873 Sportster/Buell Model: FXR Sportster/Buell Year: 1994
|
|
If you stop the page from loading at the right time,
you can see all the pics and not have to listen to that gawd awful G-n-R song.
|

|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49.
|