Members Birthdays
|
Main Menu
|
|

12th July 2010
|
 |
A Million Facts & Figures
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sandpoint
Posts: 5,883 Sportster/Buell Model: XL883 Sportster/Buell Year: 2007 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Buell Cyclone Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1999
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Lowry
Aaron looking at the aspects of the XBRR, bottom end, bore/stroke ratio, porkchop flywheels, the heavy finning ect..... Would you consider this the pinacle of aircooled twin cylinder race engines? I know it had a short race career, racing against water cooled four valve twins was nigh on impossible I guess ??? If you could would you have designed it any differently ???
|
Oh, I don't know, as soon as you say something is the "pinnacle" somebody will come up with something better. I'd say it's very well done, but pinnacle is too strong of a word.
What I see is a lot of redesign with the application of a bunch of things that are already well known, like over square bore & stroke, light flywheels, and straight ports. There's nothing really revolutionary here, but for performance, it's definitely light years ahead of the XL mill. They fixed the exact things that hold the XL motor back. They also didn't cut cost the way they do on the production bikes, everything is done right.
What really amazes me about the thing is how much redesign and retooling they had to do. I mean, these motors have very few XL or XB parts in them. It takes a lot of time and effort to develop this many new parts ... new castings, new CNC processes, new fixtures, etc. They poured a bunch of time and money into this thing considering there was a production run of a whopping 56 bikes. They must've spent a fortune, I guarantee you they lost money selling the bikes at $31K a pop. Absolutely amazing to me that they'd do that.
|

12th July 2010
|
 |
A Million Facts & Figures
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sandpoint
Posts: 5,883 Sportster/Buell Model: XL883 Sportster/Buell Year: 2007 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Buell Cyclone Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1999
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazoom
aswracing, are the rockers rollerized at all on these heads?
|
No, they're special rockers but they don't have roller tips. I'll post some pics of the assembled top end when I get a chance and show them. The whole valvetrain geometry is quite a bit different from the XL or XB mill.
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,212 Sportster/Buell Model: Buell S1 Sportster/Buell Year: 1997 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Buell S2T Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1996 Other Motorcycle Model: Moto Guzzi California Other Motorcycle Year: 2003
|
|
Based on what I have read, the firebolt was originally desinged as a 900 turbo and a short stroke 1350 with natural aspiration. I think the basic design, with cheaper materials, almost made it to production.
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
The crazy one...
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Heatville
Posts: 2,512 Sportster/Buell Model: rigid 88" highly modified Sportster/Buell Year: '03 Sportster/Buell Model #2: iforgot Sportster/Buell Year #2: 80's Other Motorcycle Model: crs Other Motorcycle Year: 80's
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aswracing
Oh, I don't know, as soon as you say something is the "pinnacle" somebody will come up with something better. I'd say it's very well done, but pinnacle is too strong of a word.
What I see is a lot of redesign with the application of a bunch of things that are already well known, like over square bore & stroke, light flywheels, and straight ports. There's nothing really revolutionary here, but for performance, it's definitely light years ahead of the XL mill. They fixed the exact things that hold the XL motor back. They also didn't cut cost the way they do on the production bikes, everything is done right.
What really amazes me about the thing is how much redesign and retooling they had to do. I mean, these motors have very few XL or XB parts in them. It takes a lot of time and effort to develop this many new parts ... new castings, new CNC processes, new fixtures, etc. They poured a bunch of time and money into this thing considering there was a production run of a whopping 56 bikes. They must've spent a fortune, I guarantee you they lost money selling the bikes at $31K a pop. Absolutely amazing to me that they'd do that.
|
So what happened to all the new castings, processes, and fixtures? Where did the 'intelligent design' go? I wonder if this was simply a prelude or possibly a testing process. Maybe the long-term plan is awaiting just over the horizon?
__________________

It is now "later" than it has ever been!
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
A Million Facts & Figures
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sandpoint
Posts: 5,883 Sportster/Buell Model: XL883 Sportster/Buell Year: 2007 Sportster/Buell Model #2: Buell Cyclone Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1999
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wilbur
So what happened to all the new castings, processes, and fixtures? Where did the 'intelligent design' go? I wonder if this was simply a prelude or possibly a testing process. Maybe the long-term plan is awaiting just over the horizon?
|
What's really odd is they were doing all this as they were simultaneously developing the 1125, watercooled DOHC 4-valve. So they knew this thing was going to be short-lived, and enormously expensive, and yet they did it anyway.
Someday I'd like to hear the real story of how this came about. I just can't imagine how they justified it.
Considering the company is gone now, I wouldn't look for anything over the horizon.
|


13th July 2010
|
 |
The crazy one...
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Heatville
Posts: 2,512 Sportster/Buell Model: rigid 88" highly modified Sportster/Buell Year: '03 Sportster/Buell Model #2: iforgot Sportster/Buell Year #2: 80's Other Motorcycle Model: crs Other Motorcycle Year: 80's
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aswracing
What's really odd is they were doing all this as they were simultaneously developing the 1125, watercooled DOHC 4-valve. So they knew this thing was going to be short-lived, and enormously expensive, and yet they did it anyway.
Someday I'd like to hear the real story of how this came about. I just can't imagine how they justified it.
Considering the company is gone now, I wouldn't look for anything over the horizon.
|
Agreed. From an organizational perspective, the return on investment would not justify the cost of capital unless there's more to the story. There must be more to the story. I don't believe any company could be so flippant with a plan.
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
XL FORUM TEAM MEMBER
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perfidious Albion
Posts: 6,937 Sportster/Buell Model: XL1250S Sportster/Buell Year: 1998
|
|
Great pictures Aaron, and some interesting development ideas. It's a pity some of this technology couldn't have been transferred to road bikes and put the sport back into Sportster. Presumably, the MoCo still owns the rights to all this...
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
Senior Chief Know It All 2nd Class
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,436 Sportster/Buell Model: 1988 4 speed XL 1424cc Sportster/Buell Year: 88 Other Motorcycle Model: 2003 Road Glide 95" stg 2
|
|
It is a unique story especially to HD, they usually get huge returns from race projects, ie KR and especially XR 750 hstory. Let's face it the VR 1000 never really panned out, maybe they didn't fund it properly, anyone's guess, but for so much "new" stuff to be in the XBRR and it only be raced for 2 years ?? that is strange. Then the 1125 comes along and all of a sudden Buell is dead. Too bad because a developmental oofshoot the 1190 has big numbers and can compete with other Race twins and win, just not on a world stage yet.....
__________________
XL's: You got love em, make em faster, handle and stop better as they get older: 116 HP & 105 lbs TQ, 88inch Axtell mountain motor.............Steve
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
Chief Know It All
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cal, AB, CND
Posts: 438 Sportster/Buell Model: X1 Sportster/Buell Year: 00 Sportster/Buell Model #2: X1 Sportster/Buell Year #2: 01 Other Motorcycle Model: xlch chop Other Motorcycle Year: 77
Reputation: 133
 
|
|
I dont remember exactly but was there not some big problem/issue with Willie G and Eric B fighting about this engine/bike at and before it was raced. My impression is Willie G is really out of touch with todays sport bikes but yet still thinks he knows all about it?. I never did and dont care for old willie g sence of race?/perf? "styling" really at all.
Anyone know anything about this story?. It would be really nice to know more details on this.
Also thinking about it now didint they also fight about the vr1000 engine too???, my impression is they did not get along.
__________________
:)Im Living the Big F... Lebowski :)
|

13th July 2010
|
 |
Senior Chief Know It All 2nd Class
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,436 Sportster/Buell Model: 1988 4 speed XL 1424cc Sportster/Buell Year: 88 Other Motorcycle Model: 2003 Road Glide 95" stg 2
|
|
Don't know but it sounds like a good story, I did read somewhere that the VR program was run by engineers and not the "old" race team managers like Obrien, or Werner................
|

|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24.
|