The Sportster and Buell Motorcycle Forum GL Sportster  

Go Back   The Sportster and Buell Motorcycle Forum > SPORTSTER MOTORCYCLE ZONE > Sportster Motorcycle Era Specific and Model Specific > XR Sportster Motorcycle Talk - XR750, XR1000, XR1200 > XR-750
XLF Gallery XLF Classifieds XLF Blogs XLF Shout XLF Arcade XLF Disclaimer/Privacy Statement/Terms Of Use

XR-750 This area is strictly for XR-750 discussion.

Members Birthdays
Figure Machine
DK Customs
DK Customs
Sportster Specialty

Lowbrow Customs
Reply
 
Share Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd February 2012
KRTTXRTT KRTTXRTT is offline
Know It All
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1984
KRTTXRTT has disabled reputation
Default XRTT Low Boy Frame Dimensions?

Could somebody share the frame dimensions of the late 1972 XRTT frame? I have a book with a side shot, but no wheelbase or steering head angle info.
Looking for the last version that had a top tube that curves up and over the rocker covers.

I have been told to use a Norton Featherbed, but would prefer to make this frame more in line with what was used then and perhaps tighten up the steering head angle? (a lot of asphalt bikes used 29 degree head angles back then and I think you can pull it in a bit with modern tires).

Any help is much appreciated!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd February 2012
matsoberg matsoberg is offline
Biker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 73
Sportster/Buell Model: XR1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1984
Reputation: 84
matsoberg is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

This one has some numbers on both XR and XRTT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harley-Davidson_XR-750
__________________
Throttle on the right -Twist to go faster
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd February 2012
KRTTXRTT KRTTXRTT is offline
Know It All
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1984
KRTTXRTT has disabled reputation
Default

Appreciate the link. Never knew they always used a 24* steering head angle?
I found Jim Belland and he explained a lot about what is required. I am getting him to make the frame as I can't think of a better way to accomplish this!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd February 2012
Streetpro's Avatar
Streetpro Streetpro is offline
Biker
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 56
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-750
Sportster/Buell Year: 1980
Sportster/Buell Model #2: Sportster 89 ci.
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1991
Reputation: 36
Streetpro is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Hi,

I remember there were some pics in the Girdler book. Sorry, but I just got no time to upload or scan pics at this moment.

Maybe this is a good reading too:
http://www.jockeyjournal.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=65122

There used to be some blue-prints of XRTT frames available, offered via e-bay I think.

Anyhow, great idea.
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27th February 2012
ralt12's Avatar
ralt12 ralt12 is offline
Biker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 29
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-750
Sportster/Buell Year: 1980
Sportster/Buell Model #2: XR-750TT
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1975
Other Motorcycle Model: Laverda SFC1000
Other Motorcycle Year: 1986
Reputation: 10
ralt12 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I got my frame from John Steel, he usually has the bits you need..
http://www.hi-speedmotorcycles.com/
__________________
1C10043H5
1C10001K4
Reply With Quote
Know Thy Hog

  #6  
Old 2nd March 2012
KRTTXRTT KRTTXRTT is offline
Know It All
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1984
KRTTXRTT has disabled reputation
Default

I did try John and he said his bits are dedicated to projects. No doubt he sees many of these requests from curiosity seekers? Since Jim Belland has built and modified many of these: I will likely come out better than if I did it!~) Mine will get raced so I am not after carrying it all the way to the drum brake level of detail. The stuff John is doing looks to be an exact replica of one of the original versions you can put in a museum.

Last edited by KRTTXRTT; 2nd March 2012 at 01:10.. Reason: syntax!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 8th June 2012
barefoot barefoot is offline
Chief Master Mechanic
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 487
Sportster/Buell Model: XR 750
Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
Sportster/Buell Model #2: RR 250
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1976
Reputation: 2833
barefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRTTXRTT View Post
Appreciate the link. Never knew they always used a 24* steering head angle?
The wikipedia page is mostly horseshit. My memory isn't perfect but the dirt trackers were about 26* and ran 19" wheels (that makes a big difference) and the standard road racers ran about the same, with Cal's bike a degree steeper at 25. He liked to go in too hot and push the front end for braking, he wore out two front tires for every rear. I might be off a degree, can ask. But wikipedia is totally wrong. Sportys run about 29*

Quote:
I found Jim Belland and he explained a lot about what is required. I am getting him to make the frame as I can't think of a better way to accomplish this!
That should do it for ya Jim's a good guy. Ask him about the time he prepped a bike for Bart Markel ... them was the days

Another good point in your favor - the featherbed is nothing special. Putting an XR motor in one (or a sporty motor for that matter) is dumb. There are a few points about the real XR roadracer that make it different. The swingarm pivot point is extremely important for a race bike, and the Featherbed won't have it right for an HD motor. The real XR does a funny thing when you get on the gas - it lifts *up* in the middle. If you have enough traction and enough motor, when you grab a handful the middle of the bike comes up and it leaps forward. It's unlike anything else I've ridden.

Also, the dropped steering head is important for a different reason than you think. Yeah, it makes the frame a tiny bit shorter and the riding position more tucked in but the real effect it has is to shorten the fork tubes by a couple inches. Short = stiff. If you ride both the street and the dirt versions, the difference is noticable. Also the road racers use 18" tires = turns quicker.

One other thing about the steering angle - they used to pull the fork tubes up or down in the triple clamps to change the (effective) head angle to suit the race track. Grab a copy of On Any Sunday and watch the roadrace sections. You'll see the fork tubes in different positions in different shots.

If you're going to get a fairing, get the big late one. Not the very latest short-course skinny one but the one right before that, the Blimp. I swear, there's no feeling like that on Earth. Okay, I haven't ridden a Moto Guzzi V8 but When you sit behind it you feel like, "Whoa boy, this is one honkin' big thingy here ! i'm not sure I can lean over !" but it does. It leans over farther than you can lean over ... unless you are Calvin Rayborn. If you like Harley pavement history, there's nothing like it. Nothing.

Don't use the Honda front brakes. Garbage. I could bever understand why they used that crap. Find a nice Fontana (oops, bye-bye wallet) or even a decent set of aftermarket disks. The Fontana has great feel, much better than any disk. Unless you are racing fade won't be a problem and you're not going to heat it up so much the spokes get loose (which is why they had to go away from them.) That Honda stuff is awful. Who in the hell uses two twenty-pound stainless steel no-coefficient-of-friction no-feel no-heat-conductivity rotors ? Yuck.

If you build a fairly-accurate road race replica you will love it. Promise. It is one great bike to ride.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 8th June 2012
KRTTXRTT KRTTXRTT is offline
Know It All
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 152
Sportster/Buell Model: XR-1000
Sportster/Buell Year: 1984
KRTTXRTT has disabled reputation
Default

Thanks Barefoot! I appreciate the input. Back when I was racing I always wanted an XRTT and now that I am old...er (a lot!) I still do.
Back in about 1980 I watched Malcomb Tunstall ride a protoype Iron head version with two carbs (both 45mm Mikuni's!) and it was shocking to see what he could do on that old war horse. It still had the 35mm Ceriani yet used the later low boy frame and was very competitive at Robeling Road. Jim told me they had cured the heating problem by the time that bike was built, yet the alloy version became the focus and the rest is history... I am building mine to be fairly accurate. Currently I am thinking I will use Gremeca calipers on some iron rotors as they are allowed in the vintage class (availible in 1973 etc) likley on spoke wheels all though I keep looking at older mags with some lust. I am still using the Cerianin road race fork too, as I think it will work with that low steering head (short = stiff - I tell my wife that!). Glad you mentioned riding one and liking it. Malcomb Tunstall could ride a watermelon pretty quickly - not to mention the greatest pavement rider ever (Mr Rayborn in my book) so it was hard to tell if they really worked that well or? If you want to, share the ride you had: which track and of what length was the ride? I think they only made about 8 of them so it is hard to find people that have actual seat time.
Also, I will be specifying a 26 degree head angle. With modern tires I fear that 25 degrees might twist frame/fork up a bit more than I expect (no problem for Cal of course).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8th June 2012
Bob F's Avatar
Bob F Bob F is offline
XL FORUM LIFE MEMBER
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 13,149
Sportster/Buell Model: XL50 0596 Black
Sportster/Buell Year: 2007
Other Motorcycle Model: E-Glide
Other Motorcycle Year: 2003
Reputation: 46270
Bob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to beholdBob F is a splendid one to behold
Default

Rocky Mountain HD 1981:

__________________
Bob, a glutton and a winebibber, a friend of bartenders and sinners!

Sportys tend to keep getting faster the longer you own them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 9th June 2012
barefoot barefoot is offline
Chief Master Mechanic
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 487
Sportster/Buell Model: XR 750
Sportster/Buell Year: 1972
Sportster/Buell Model #2: RR 250
Sportster/Buell Year #2: 1976
Reputation: 2833
barefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the roughbarefoot is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRTTXRTT View Post
Back when I was racing I always wanted an XRTT and now that I am old...er (a lot!) I still do.
You shouldn't get me started

Don't tell anyone but the XR road racer is probably one of the most fun things there is to ride, if you like v-twins. It's at the tail end of class C so it's not some ridiculous pile of Jap tinfoil that may as well be a refrigerator .. it still feels like a bike. And they are easy to ride.

Quote:
Back in about 1980 I watched Malcomb Tunstall ride a protoype Iron head version with two carbs (both 45mm Mikuni's!) and it was shocking to see what he could do on that old war horse.
They are skinny and short and lean over easy but they are also stable so you don't need ABS and a gyroscope to ride them. They don't weigh 600 lbs. You can hop on and go and have the time of your life. They are the end of the Mike the Bike, John Surtees, Gary Nixon neat tucked-in style of riding. The only thing that might be as much fun would be a BSA or Triumph triple of the same period. Okay, a TZ-700 would be exciting but ... not the same

Want to see some people get pissed off ? Ducatis are bear squat by comparison. The 90* cylinder angle sucks, the wheelbase is too long, you can't get enough weight on the front wheel, the heads don't flow, in comparison to an HD they are crap If HD really wanted the Sport Bike segment they didn't need Buell. All they had to do was streetify an XR road racer. There's no Ducati born that could keep up.

Yuppies .... sigh. I must be having a second childhood but haven't really paid much attention to motorcycles for a while. All of a sudden the place has been swamped with yuppies who know everything but everything they know is wrong. They adore all this stuff that in 1970 you couldn't pay people to take. A friend's shop got one of the early Ducati dealerships - he was lucky to sell three or four bikes. And Harley - jeeze. If a magazine had an article about an H-D in it, you couldn't pick it up it was so hot from all the nasty words they used. Most people hated Harley.

Quote:
It still had the 35mm Ceriani yet used the later low boy frame
When they were racing Class C they always had the 35 mm Cerianis. That was all there was The thing is, Cerianis came in different lengths. The road racers had the very shortest you could get, and sometimes they even cut the tubes shorter. (Easy to do on Cerianis , it's just a tube with some threads at the top and a snapring groove.) With that dropped steering head if you run the shortest Cerianis, pop the springs out and you will see the triple clamps almost touch the tops of the fork slider boots. They are as short as you can get. And we know what that means

Quote:
Jim told me they had cured the heating problem by the time that bike was built
Yeah, right. My They stuck two or three coolers on the oil going into the heads, they pumped as much oil as they could find through the heads, they put in external drains so the hot oil from the heads could go direct to the sump without boiling the rest of the engine, the iron XR's looked like a pre-war Vincent "plumber's nightmare" and they still melted.

I fixed the problem. I ran alcohol. But you can't do that if you are serious. This was AFM Open GP in the days when everybody was just having a good time. If it had started winning then someone would have bitched but until then, it's "run what ya brung and have a good time." Everybody in the back was cheating and we all knew it. Chamber's Rickman Honda 750 had like 1200 cc's and nobody cared and he probably wasn't the worst offender.

Quote:
yet the alloy version became the focus and the rest is history...
It was a time of big changes .... and the end of AMA popularity, if you want to know the truth. The AMA blew it bigtime. Gordon Jennings even wrote an article about this at the time, so it was not a surprise to people with brains.

It's kind of funny ... you see the same thing in human history time after time after time. Maybe there is no getting around it. Something becomes popular because it is very very cool. Then because it is popular, the hangers-on, the yuppies, the promoters, the leeches have to get in there and grab a big bite. Television ! Advertising money ! We'se gonna be stars ! And suddenly it is no longer cool or special or wonderful and there are no real people with character quirks and personalities* involved, it's just another advertising campaign. And then of course since it's no longer any good it becomes not-popular so the hangers-on wander off to destroy something else and all you have are memories. The AMA in the mid-seventies was disgusting, worse than a two-bit crack whore. Ed Youngblood, bah.

* There was a national in the Midwest that got rained out. Everybody is there but no race. Springer is like, "Shit, I didn't come to sit here in the van" so he found a vacant warehouse nearby. Talks to everybody, they all take their pit bikes and sneak into the warehouse, everybody throws $5 into the pot and they hold their own national for a $150 purse. That's AMA dirt guys. Cale Yarborough, Tony Stewart ? Yup. Jeff Gordon, Jorge Lorenzo, Dani Pedroso ? What do you think ?


Quote:
I am building mine to be fairly accurate.
Accurate as a fun street bike or accurate as a vintage racer ? Or accurate-looking as a fun thing to build and ride ? The three are not the same

Quote:
Currently I am thinking I will use Gremeca calipers on some iron rotors as they are allowed in the vintage class (availible in 1973 etc) likely on spoke wheels all though I keep looking at older mags with some lust.
I suppose Morris Mags would be okay - at the time they were "mmmm, nice !" but today, I'd go with spoked wheels. And if you can find one, a Fontana. It is so much nicer than a disk brake. If this is for fun, go with the drum brake. Honest. The most fun I ever had (on a bike) was with a Sprint road racer at Sears with Oldani brakes. You don't actually ride a Sprint : you sort of think, "Go left" and it does. Or, "Go right. Now stop on a dime. Okay, let's go again" and it does. With those Italian drum brakes you can feel the slightest little weed, bump, slimy spot, anything. They have so much feel and such low lever pressure that you will fall in love. If you're Calvin going for the win at a National maybe not so much but for a fun ride ? Fontana all the way. Or Ceriani. or Oldani.

To tell the truth, a Sprint road racer is probably the most fun you can have. They go fast enough but you always feel like you are in total control, unlike with a 77-inch Sportster motor

Quote:
I am still using the Cerianin road race fork too, as I think it will work with that low steering head (short = stiff - I tell my wife that!).
The short Ceriani will be fine. You can't find the upper triple clamp anymore but you can modify a standard one to look the same.

Have to be careful what you tell the wife, they are likely to tell you "Can't beat cubic inches" I just keep my mouth shut now, it's safer ....

Quote:
the greatest pavement rider ever (Mr Rayborn in my book) so it was hard to tell if they really worked that well or?
I think they work great but me and them are both from a bygone age ... I don't think picking up the front wheel and accelerating into the nearest tree at 130 mph is so much fun. People nowadays like that. I thought duHamel was a dunce (the idiot crashed right in front of me in the pits once, what a turkey), but that's what people like now. So you just have to decide what you like and do that and to hell with everybody else.

First off, you could make a fun street bike. A reasonably builtup Sportster engine would be fairly cheap and great fun on country roads.

You could build the lightest, most fun least-scary road racer and be very vintage by making it a flathead. You could do a 61 inch flatty that would go good and be a lot lighter and handle better than an overhead and be even more vintage than an overhead. And they weren't slow - the flatheads were doing 1:52's at Sears, which ain't slow. And close to 150 at Daytona, if I remember right.

You could do a Rayborn iron replica but too many breakdowns. I would not recommend that.

You could build something that would scare yourself and probably hurt you by basically putting a dragster Sportster motor into that frame. Run it on alcohol This is most people's first inclination - we all want more power ! but I dunno ... at some point the fun is in the activity, not in messing your pants.

A real XR or XR-1000 is just too much money for the fun you'd get out of it. And either one would be too much work and money to keep running.

I think if I were going to race one I'd go with either a flathead or a fairly mild motor that's not going to give any trouble, but let me spend my time riding instead of doing valve jobs and replacing the oil pump.

Quote:
share the ride you had: which track and of what length was the ride?
Sears Point and Ontario ... my sister swears we went to Willow Springs once but I don't remember it. Probably true though because she went on at great length about how she learned to slipstream tractor-trailers on that trip. Oops

Anyway, the XR is fun anywhere. It's just fun, period ... but it's maybe a little more fun accelerating off a turn. I did not like Ontario at all. The front straight and turn one was a thrill (off the highway at 150 into the driveway everybody says "don't touch the brakes until turn six, yeah right !), the rest was a featureless mess. Riverside was sort of okay but still not great. (I didn't have the Harley XR running then but ran the Vincent in an XR dirt frame there so have a good comparison point.) Sears was great fun. I'm more of an accelerate-out kinda guy rather than a slam on the brakes and hope you don't crash kinda guy. And swoops. Swoopy is great on the hog.

Speaking of which, this is one of the more impressive things I've seen : Sears Point, the race Roberts won so convincingly. Turn 11 is a nasty right-hand turn. Not tight enough to be a hairpin, not wide enough to be a real turn, there's a spring underneath and the pavement is always all broken up, slow and just nasty. Nasty nasty nasty and this was when Sears was all run down, before they repaved it and made it sweet for the modern pretty-boys. (Remember that when you compare times over the years, too. Sears was in terrible condition in the seventies.) In practice Romero would come through ten (sweeping right-hander and slippery as snot) flat out on his triple, wait way too late to brake for eleven, get on the brakes way too hard, let the inertia throw him forward onto the tank, the back end would come loose and whip around out from under him, about halfway through spinning out he'd calmly sit back in the seat, get traction, grab a handful and blast out of eleven. There's a three foot high concrete wall on the outside of this turn, by the way. No one else did that, not even Mr Roberts. He must have done this a dozen times in practice but never in the race. I always wondered why.

Speaking of Mr Roberts, right past eleven there's a pretty good left-hand kink in the "front straight." during the first ten laps or so of the national, KR would come through there heeled over about 45* hanging off the bike on the left, missing the pit wall by an inch or so, front wheel about a foot in the air, banging off shifts. It was like, "WTF !!" That was the most impressive ride I've ever seen anywhere, any time. It just made your mouth fall open. National numbers watching on the back side of the track were saying, "You can't do that. It's impossible." I don't care for Yamaha very much ? but if you were to pick the world's greatest roadracer of all time, it would be hard not to choose Kenny Roberts. There would have been some exciting races if Calvin R hadn't died.

Quote:
I think they only made about 8 of them so it is hard to find people that have actual seat time.
I bet there's a lot more than 8. Yuppy collectors always do talk that way to jack up the value of their stuff. My chassis came from a Junior who ran it for a year, and in the factory photos there were always at least six or eight riders on them. They aren't that exotic : just the dropped steering head and a shorter swingarm is all. You could make one from just the swingarm-pivot casting if you wanted. All the fiberglass is available. (Having Jim B do it though is a good idea. He's done it before and knows what he's doing and is a cool guy. Just don't let him talk you into going with the dirt track geometry )

Quote:
Also, I will be specifying a 26 degree head angle. With modern tires I fear that 25 degrees might twist frame/fork up a bit more than I expect...
You know what ? You can get too carried away with specs. I got too carried away with building stuff and never really got to ride it as much as I wanted (started working for myself, that was the end of fun). A stock XR frame to roadrace specs, a decent reliable Sporty motor of whatever configuration you want, and go have fun. Don't let yourself get carried away with the latest trickest this that or the other thing (electronic ignition tho - do NOT use the F-M magneto, UGH !) and every lap you spend riding instead of fixing will be your reward.

You'll have a great time. Promise ! They are a great bike.
Reply With Quote
Know Thy Hog

Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


Custom Search

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:40.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XL Forum - Linson Media LLC